From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: Fwd: can we remove the quirk SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN ? Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:55:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20101109115517.GD3223@pengutronix.de> References: <4D68A6A7-2D95-463F-875B-DB52ECCC53F1@marvell.com> <65EBF3EE-DE1E-46A4-BF41-A9D5A6096673@marvell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IMjqdzrDRly81ofr" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:57932 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754822Ab0KILzT (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 06:55:19 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <65EBF3EE-DE1E-46A4-BF41-A9D5A6096673@marvell.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Philip Rakity Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Zhangfei Gao --IMjqdzrDRly81ofr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 03:45:15AM -0800, Philip Rakity wrote: >=20 > reposting since we are discussing removing quirks. =20 >=20 > We could partition the quirks into one set for controller quirks and one = set for platform quirks. That would give us another 32 quirks.=20 IMHO we need less quirks, not more. Adding the number of potential quirks just delays the underlying problem. Also, unless someone enlightens me, I don't think there are platform quirks, only platform_data? Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --IMjqdzrDRly81ofr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzZNqUACgkQD27XaX1/VRtdlQCgqePclcbOaJuwrNg0OoPyMM53 RzgAn3CB2LGR1sVBR/5OVxt1/NeGxTr7 =5vl2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IMjqdzrDRly81ofr--