From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: can we remove the quirk SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN ? Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:21:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20101109122157.GF3223@pengutronix.de> References: <4D68A6A7-2D95-463F-875B-DB52ECCC53F1@marvell.com> <65EBF3EE-DE1E-46A4-BF41-A9D5A6096673@marvell.com> <20101109115517.GD3223@pengutronix.de> <23C594B6-1B72-4DE0-8BE7-04E1FD36B58E@marvell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6v9BRtpmy+umdQlo" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:52240 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754381Ab0KIMWB (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:22:01 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23C594B6-1B72-4DE0-8BE7-04E1FD36B58E@marvell.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Philip Rakity Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Zhangfei Gao --6v9BRtpmy+umdQlo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Philip, > Doesn't the platform data hold the specific board specific quirks ? If we agree on not calling it "quirks" but "configuration", then we may in deed be talking about the very same thing :) > Can you provide an example of how you see the platform data being > used. Sad thing is that I don't have a board using an 8 bit width bus :( Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --6v9BRtpmy+umdQlo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzZPOUACgkQD27XaX1/VRtE7wCgt412ypc5t0oY0udY/7vqSxkW PY4An2exkMExoGPCtHuammY2tilPMKAS =QWMm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6v9BRtpmy+umdQlo--