From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MMC fixes for 2.6.37 Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:13:11 +0000 Message-ID: <20101223191311.GA9220@void.printf.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:51723 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751081Ab0LWTNO (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:13:14 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Kyungmin Park Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks Hi Kyungmin, On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 06:17:50PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > Can you include the s5pc210 external clock support? As I said: If Ben agrees, I'm happy to send it on. If Ben stays silent, then I have to overrule him -- he's the maintainer of this driver. I'm okay with doing that, but I'd like to do it by shipping these patches in the next merge window and giving him (and others who test the -rc series) time to disagree. > without this, s5pc210 boards doesn't use the SDHCI. But that's not a regression from earlier kernels (correct me if I'm wrong). Adding support for a new board is a merge window task, not a final-fixes-before-release task. I'm sorry these patches have been waiting so long. I didn't realize Ben would stay silent on them -- in future, I'll shorten my timeout for an ACK from Ben. Thanks, -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child