From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: add sdhci-tegra driver for Tegra SoCs Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 04:11:26 +0000 Message-ID: <20101231041124.GB19122@void.printf.net> References: <1293096475-19634-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> <1293096828-19985-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> <20101223112346.GA5044@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:45082 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750827Ab0LaELl (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2010 23:11:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: Wolfram Sang , Mike Rapoport , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Yvonne Yip Hi Olof, On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:27:29AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > But yeah, defaulting to RW makes more sense. v4 coming once I know if > you want me to rip out the new quirk or not. I'll take a v4 with the remaining quirk for now, and we'd be extremely interested in seeing sdhci_ops->fixup work and quirk removal from you. For what it's worth, Wolfram's not singling you out -- recently we've been consistently rejecting patches that add new SDHCI quirks and asking for rework. (See Takashi's JMicron 388 patch, for example.) Thanks! -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child