From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Pawel Moll <mail@pawelmoll.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
Yusuke Goda <yusuke.goda.sx@renesas.com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:45:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110110154514.GC3760@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1e9db480d82d1804930ddcc7bb0db02@rootnode.net>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:10:19AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0900, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
> wrote:
> >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/Makefile | 8 +
> >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/vrl4.c | 169
> >>+++++++++++++++++++++
> >>How about putting those two into "tools" (in particular "tools/arm")
> >>instead of "Documentation"?
> >>Just a thought... ;-)
> >
> >Thats fine by me except that tools/arm doesn't exist yet.
> >It would be good to get some consensus before creating it.
>
> I think there is consensus regarding "tools" as a place for user-space
> tools - eg. perf tools used to live in "Documentation/..." and then were
> moved to "tools/perf".
>
> Now, whether your stuff should be in "tools/SH-Mobile" or
> "tools/arm/SH-Mobile", I have no opinion ;-)
>
I agree that this is a worthwhile direction to move to, but we're a long
way from a consensus. x86 has traditionally littered scripts/ and others
have sunk to arch/<foo>/tools hostprogs abuse and so forth. perf is a bit
of a special case in that it's fairly architecture agnostic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-10 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-09 12:49 [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM Simon Horman
2011-01-09 16:12 ` Paweł Moll
2011-01-09 22:50 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-10 10:10 ` Pawel Moll
2011-01-10 15:45 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2011-01-10 22:41 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-09 23:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-09 23:52 ` Simon Horman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-09 12:39 Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110110154514.GC3760@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mail@pawelmoll.com \
--cc=yusuke.goda.sx@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox