From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:45:14 +0900 Message-ID: <20110110154514.GC3760@linux-sh.org> References: <20110109124928.GC25591@verge.net.au> <1294589548.8897.1.camel@rojo> <20110109225042.GB29257@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from 124x34x33x190.ap124.ftth.ucom.ne.jp ([124.34.33.190]:56846 "EHLO master.linux-sh.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751266Ab1AJPrU (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:47:20 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Pawel Moll Cc: Simon Horman , Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Yusuke Goda , Chris Ball , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:10:19AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0900, Simon Horman > wrote: > >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/Makefile | 8 + > >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/vrl4.c | 169 > >>+++++++++++++++++++++ > >>How about putting those two into "tools" (in particular "tools/arm") > >>instead of "Documentation"? > >>Just a thought... ;-) > > > >Thats fine by me except that tools/arm doesn't exist yet. > >It would be good to get some consensus before creating it. > > I think there is consensus regarding "tools" as a place for user-space > tools - eg. perf tools used to live in "Documentation/..." and then were > moved to "tools/perf". > > Now, whether your stuff should be in "tools/SH-Mobile" or > "tools/arm/SH-Mobile", I have no opinion ;-) > I agree that this is a worthwhile direction to move to, but we're a long way from a consensus. x86 has traditionally littered scripts/ and others have sunk to arch//tools hostprogs abuse and so forth. perf is a bit of a special case in that it's fairly architecture agnostic.