From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [REVIEW 2/2] ENGR0000137838 SDHCI Some eMMC cards can't work well in our BSP Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:07:44 +0000 Message-ID: <20110111020743.GA9534@void.printf.net> References: <1294711368-446-1-git-send-email-r65037@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:45723 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753277Ab1AKCHr (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:07:47 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1294711368-446-1-git-send-email-r65037@freescale.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Zhu Cc: r58066@freescale.com, root@udp161639uds.ap.freescale.net, lnxrevli@freescale.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:02:48AM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote: > Pick up the patch from the community. > > fc8a0985c2846292312556cba10b8a4182f55967 > From: Hanumath Prasad > Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:01:45 -0700 > Subject: [REVIEW 2/2] mmc: only set blockaddressed for > 2GiB cards > > A non-zero value of SEC_COUNT does not indicate that the card is sector > addressed. According to the MMC specification, cards > with a densitygreater than 2GiB are sector addressed. What's the point of sending this mail to linux-mmc@? -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child