* [REVIEW 2/2] ENGR0000137838 SDHCI Some eMMC cards can't work well in our BSP
@ 2011-01-11 2:02 Richard Zhu
2011-01-11 2:07 ` Chris Ball
[not found] ` <1.10.2011-mgd.freescale.com-30-6343028328831767454500-3831@freescale.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Zhu @ 2011-01-11 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: r58066, root; +Cc: lnxrevli, Richard Zhu, linux-mmc
Pick up the patch from the community.
fc8a0985c2846292312556cba10b8a4182f55967
From: Hanumath Prasad <hanumath.prasad@stericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:01:45 -0700
Subject: [REVIEW 2/2] mmc: only set blockaddressed for > 2GiB cards
A non-zero value of SEC_COUNT does not indicate that the card is sector
addressed. According to the MMC specification, cards
with a densitygreater than 2GiB are sector addressed.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanumath Prasad <hanumath.prasad@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <r65037@freescale.com>
drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
ENGR0000137838 SDHCI Some eMMC cards can't work well in our BSP
sha : ce733e353d0ac82c9a607b708f7de2b214408445
local branch is : imx_2.6.35
remote_branch : origin/imx_2.6.35
branch_start : v2.6.35.3
review-commits last updated 2010-12-31 13:49 /home/r65037/bin/linux-infra/tools/review-commits
d33ca02dca1624e86b1513e7bb7cce7281cd9590 don't generate pkg for linux-2.6-testbu
ild for cherry-pick experiment
git version 1.6.3.3
Running checkpatch.pl:
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 10 lines checked
Your patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission.
checking header of ce733e3: ENGR0000137838 SDHCI Some eMMC cards can't work well in our BSP
check header: PASS
Checking kernel paths: PASS
review-commits: PASS
=============================================
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
index 4a9e2ed..95e13c2 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
@@ -222,7 +222,9 @@ static int mmc_read_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card)
ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SEC_CNT + 1] << 8 |
ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SEC_CNT + 2] << 16 |
ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SEC_CNT + 3] << 24;
- if (card->ext_csd.sectors)
+
+ /* Cards with density > 2GiB are sector addressed */
+ if (card->ext_csd.sectors > (2u * 1024 * 1024 * 1024) / 512)
mmc_card_set_blockaddr(card);
}
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [REVIEW 2/2] ENGR0000137838 SDHCI Some eMMC cards can't work well in our BSP
2011-01-11 2:02 [REVIEW 2/2] ENGR0000137838 SDHCI Some eMMC cards can't work well in our BSP Richard Zhu
@ 2011-01-11 2:07 ` Chris Ball
[not found] ` <1.10.2011-mgd.freescale.com-30-6343028328831767454500-3831@freescale.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ball @ 2011-01-11 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Zhu; +Cc: r58066, root, lnxrevli, linux-mmc
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:02:48AM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> Pick up the patch from the community.
>
> fc8a0985c2846292312556cba10b8a4182f55967
> From: Hanumath Prasad <hanumath.prasad@stericsson.com>
> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:01:45 -0700
> Subject: [REVIEW 2/2] mmc: only set blockaddressed for > 2GiB cards
>
> A non-zero value of SEC_COUNT does not indicate that the card is sector
> addressed. According to the MMC specification, cards
> with a densitygreater than 2GiB are sector addressed.
What's the point of sending this mail to linux-mmc@?
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <1.10.2011-mgd.freescale.com-30-6343028328831767454500-3831@freescale.com>]
* RE: Re:[lnxrevli] [REVIEW 2/2] ENGR0000137838 SDHCI Some eMMC cards can't workwell in our BSP
[not found] ` <1.10.2011-mgd.freescale.com-30-6343028328831767454500-3831@freescale.com>
@ 2011-01-11 2:17 ` Zhu Richard-R65037
2011-01-11 2:22 ` Chris Ball
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zhu Richard-R65037 @ 2011-01-11 2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Ball
Cc: Zhang Lily-R58066, root@udp161639uds.ap.freescale.net,
ReviewList Linux-LNXREVLI, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Hi Chris:
I keep all the info of the original patch into my local patch.
The script the pull-tool used by us send out the emails to all the sign-off email address,
When I used this tool to push the local patch into our mainline.
Sorry to bring any inconvenience to you.
Best Regards
Richard Zhu
Best Regards
Richard Zhu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Ball [mailto:cjb@laptop.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 10:08 AM
> To: Zhu Richard-R65037
> Cc: Zhang Lily-R58066; root@udp161639uds.ap.freescale.net; ReviewList
> Linux-LNXREVLI; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re:[lnxrevli] [REVIEW 2/2] ENGR0000137838 SDHCI Some eMMC cards
> can't workwell in our BSP
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:02:48AM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > Pick up the patch from the community.
> >
> > fc8a0985c2846292312556cba10b8a4182f55967
> > From: Hanumath Prasad <hanumath.prasad@stericsson.com>
> > Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:01:45 -0700
> > Subject: [REVIEW 2/2] mmc: only set blockaddressed for > 2GiB cards
> >
> > A non-zero value of SEC_COUNT does not indicate that the card is
> > sector addressed. According to the MMC specification, cards with a
> > densitygreater than 2GiB are sector addressed.
>
> What's the point of sending this mail to linux-mmc@?
>
> --
> Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
> One Laptop Per Child
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Re:[lnxrevli] [REVIEW 2/2] ENGR0000137838 SDHCI Some eMMC cards can't workwell in our BSP
2011-01-11 2:17 ` Re:[lnxrevli] [REVIEW 2/2] ENGR0000137838 SDHCI Some eMMC cards can't workwell " Zhu Richard-R65037
@ 2011-01-11 2:22 ` Chris Ball
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ball @ 2011-01-11 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhu Richard-R65037
Cc: Zhang Lily-R58066, root@udp161639uds.ap.freescale.net,
ReviewList Linux-LNXREVLI, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Hi Richard,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 02:17:08AM +0000, Zhu Richard-R65037 wrote:
> Hi Chris:
> I keep all the info of the original patch into my local patch.
> The script the pull-tool used by us send out the emails to all the sign-off email address,
> When I used this tool to push the local patch into our mainline.
> Sorry to bring any inconvenience to you.
Please modify the script so that it does not send mail to the people
in the Signed-off chain, or at least so that it never sends mail to
linux-mmc@. The fact that you're importing a patch locally is off-topic
for the list.
Thanks,
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-11 2:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-11 2:02 [REVIEW 2/2] ENGR0000137838 SDHCI Some eMMC cards can't work well in our BSP Richard Zhu
2011-01-11 2:07 ` Chris Ball
[not found] ` <1.10.2011-mgd.freescale.com-30-6343028328831767454500-3831@freescale.com>
2011-01-11 2:17 ` Re:[lnxrevli] [REVIEW 2/2] ENGR0000137838 SDHCI Some eMMC cards can't workwell " Zhu Richard-R65037
2011-01-11 2:22 ` Chris Ball
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox