From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: Replace SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_MULTIBLOCK with a platform hook. Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:22:12 +0000 Message-ID: <20110212202212.GA11375@void.printf.net> References: <20110207174839.GF3123@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:49656 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752602Ab1BLUWO (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:22:14 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110207174839.GF3123@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Anton Vorontsov Hi Wolfram, On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 06:48:39PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hmm, for now I don't have a better alternative, but I somehow hink there must > be a better solution than to add one hook per [...] If there still isn't a better alternative in mind, I'm thinking about going ahead and taking this patch, and then reusing the quirk bit for Chuanxiao's "mmc: set a suitable max_discard_sectors value for HC" patchset. (Anton, please speak up if this quirk removal isn't okay with you.) Thanks! - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child