From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: Replace SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_MULTIBLOCK with a platform hook. Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:05:41 +0000 Message-ID: <20110212210541.GA11634@void.printf.net> References: <20110207174839.GF3123@pengutronix.de> <20110212202212.GA11375@void.printf.net> <20110212204350.GA23657@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:39057 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750922Ab1BLVFn (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:05:43 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110212204350.GA23657@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Anton Vorontsov Hi Wolfram, On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:43:50PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > If there still isn't a better alternative in mind, I'm thinking about > > going ahead and taking this patch, and then reusing the quirk bit for > > Chuanxiao's "mmc: set a suitable max_discard_sectors value for HC" > > patchset. > > What about using the SZ_2048 quirk instead which could be done via > io-accessors? That sounds fine too; I thought this one was more straightforward. > That being said, I have a train travel tomorrow and will try to > see if a fixup() function would make sense for this one. Can you > wait one more day? Sure, no immediate hurry. Thanks! -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child