From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] MMC DMA-API/dmaengine fixups Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:54:54 +0000 Message-ID: <20110217025454.GA22589@void.printf.net> References: <1297350372-725-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:35013 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756090Ab1BQCzC (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:55:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Guennadi Liakhovetski , Simon Horman , Arnd Hannemann , Magnus Damm , Paul Mundt , Dan Williams , Linus Walleij On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:04:20PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > Chris are you picking these up? Maybe the only way of getting > some broad test of these cleanups is to push it into -next > so it'll be noticed... Hm, okay -- I've pushed the whole patchset to mmc-next. (-next is supposed to be a set of trees that each maintainer would be comfortable pushing to Linus immediately, though..) I'd still like to see some ACKs for tmio/sh_mmc before pushing these to mainline. I'm CCing some folks who should be able to help out with testing; if you can, would be much appreciated! Thanks, -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child