From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Mikko Vinni <mmvinni@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] sdhci: work around broken dma boundary behaviour
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:28:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110314152817.GD2206@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <470477.34668.qm@web161814.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3556 bytes --]
> > I was just referring to using "<at>" instead of "@". The provider
> > doesn't really matter :)
>
> Ah, ok. Yahoo makes it practically impossible to send well-formed
> patches from the web interface, but as long as it's not completely
> rejected for casual email, I prefer to keep the number of spam
> addresses to the minimum.
Okay, well, that is up to Chris.
> Almost. There is one statement in the spec ("At the end of transfer, the Host
> Controller may issue or may not issue DMA Interrupt"), which makes
> me wonder whether a host hontroller may issue a DMA Interrupt also at
> the end of a transfer which doesn't finish at the boundary.
Then we'll have a "useless" update. Won't hurt AFAICS, but might
surprise people examining the debug output.
> In sdhci.c or sdhci.c? I see SDHCI_MAKE_BLKSZ is used also in
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c and drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c.
In those, I think it is okay to leave 0x07, because they always want to
clear all bits.
> I only compile tested this so far, so no proper patch yet, but what I would
> write based on the comments is something like this:
(Sidenote: Indentation is broken. Tabwidth is 8)
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> @@ -201,6 +201,9 @@
> #define SDHCI_MAX_DIV_SPEC_200 256
> #define SDHCI_MAX_DIV_SPEC_300 2046
>
> +#define SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE (512 * 1024)
> +#define SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_ARG (ilog2(SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE) - 12)
> +
> struct sdhci_ops {
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_IO_ACCESSORS
> u32 (*read_l)(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg);
>
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -808,7 +808,8 @@ static void sdhci_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *host,
> struct mmc_data *data)
> sdhci_set_transfer_irqs(host);
>
> /* We do not handle DMA boundaries, so set it to max (512 KiB) */
> - sdhci_writew(host, SDHCI_MAKE_BLKSZ(7, data->blksz), SDHCI_BLOCK_SIZE);
> + sdhci_writew(host, SDHCI_MAKE_BLKSZ(SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_ARG,
> + data->blksz), SDHCI_BLOCK_SIZE);
> sdhci_writew(host, data->blocks, SDHCI_BLOCK_COUNT);
> }
>
> @@ -1545,9 +1546,20 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32
> intmask)
> * boundaries, but as we can't disable the feature
> * we need to at least restart the transfer.
> */
> - if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DMA_END)
> - sdhci_writel(host, sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS),
> - SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS);
> + if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DMA_END) {
> + u32 dmastart, dmanow;
> + dmastart = sg_dma_address(host->data->sg);
Consecutive transfers won't work (I know you know ;)).
> + dmanow = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS);
> + /*
> + * Force update to the next DMA block boundary.
> + */
> + dmanow = (dmastart &
> + ~(SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE - 1)) +
> + SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE;
> + DBG("%s: next DMA address after 0x%08x is 0x%08x\n",
> + mmc_hostname(host->mmc), dmastart, dmanow);
> + sdhci_writel(host, dmanow, SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS);
> + }
Other than that, looks like the right direction to me.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-14 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-07 20:40 [PATCH resend] sdhci: work around broken dma boundary behaviour Mikko Vinni
2011-03-08 20:12 ` Chris Ball
2011-03-08 22:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-03-12 21:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-03-14 9:23 ` Mikko Vinni
2011-03-14 10:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-03-14 13:00 ` Mikko Vinni
2011-03-14 15:28 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2011-03-14 15:58 ` Mikko Vinni
2011-03-14 17:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-03-29 8:53 ` [RFC] mmc: sdhci: work around broken dma boundary behavior Mikko Vinni
2011-04-11 21:05 ` Chris Ball
2011-04-12 4:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-04-12 17:29 ` Chris Ball
2011-04-13 7:04 ` Mikko Vinni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110314152817.GD2206@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmvinni@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).