From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: USB SDIO/SD/MMC Host Controller (VUB300) driver Re-Resubmission Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:41:08 +0100 Message-ID: <201103151641.08336.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20B0EAA71DD7413A9A29D0493C6C1D87@AN00536> <20110315094041.GA32015@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:64671 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758073Ab1COPlS (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:41:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball Cc: Wolfram Sang , Tony Olech , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 15 March 2011, Chris Ball wrote: > I thought about it, but I think staging drivers generally have a much > larger TODO list than this one would. > > Perhaps a good plan is: I'll push it to mmc-next after the 2.6.39 merge, > then I'll try to work on style changes a bit (I'll send each patch to the > list and Tony can ACK/NACK them), and then we can include it in 2.6.40 > either as a normal driver if we're comfortable with how it's ended up, > or as a staging driver if we'd still like to get some more eyes on it. > > Does that sound okay to everyone? Sounds good to me. I certainly wouldn't rush it now after the merge window is open. I'll also do a quick review for a TODO list. Arnd