From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-pci: Fix checkpatch.pl errors Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:35:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20110411143515.GA27017@pengutronix.de> References: <1302027193-15696-1-git-send-email-2ameya@gmail.com> <20110408185502.GA27873@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:45384 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752434Ab1DKOfR (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:35:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Ameya Palande <2ameya@gmail.com> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:47:02PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote: > Hi Wolfram, >=20 > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Wolfram Sang wrot= e: > > Hi Ameya, > > > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:13:13PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote: > >> This patch fixes 21 errors and 6 warnings reported by checkpatch.pl > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ameya Palande <2ameya@gmail.com> > > > > Looks okay to me. Have you checked that the binary does not differ? >=20 > Thanks for your review! Binaries are same. Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2jEaMACgkQD27XaX1/VRvxBwCgpjJadganboZhJKDbj/pTbw0J owsAn1cz8a8HYvQ7VdBF48m9B7jVyJGW =cBXu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--