From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: SD Patches Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:31:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20110428083124.GA4744@pengutronix.de> References: <000301cc0549$d9dbbd70$8d933850$@org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:60390 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756186Ab1D1Ib3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 04:31:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000301cc0549$d9dbbd70$8d933850$@org> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Subhash Jadavani Cc: 'Philip Rakity' , 'Chris Ball' , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, 'Arindam Nath' --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:13:22PM -0700, Subhash Jadavani wrote: > I have also reviewed Arindam's SD3.0 patches and looks good to me. Althou= gh > I haven't tested those yet. Thanks. To make it easier next time: The usual pattern for this is replying directly to the series to [PATCH 0/x] (if you mean the whole series) or rep= ly to each [PATCH n/x] with something like Reviewed-by: Your name Tested-by: Your name (I have keyboard macros for those ;)) Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk25JdwACgkQD27XaX1/VRtPsQCffnvJ28tyHu9rxZYf1J14OP60 /MAAniMLu8fW9ZnegxtFlwUwJxiInjaI =f0Pb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--