Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered

[Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>]

Hi Wolfram,

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:40:46AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
> 
> > Changes since v1:
> >  * Rebase on cjb's mmc-next tree
> 
> Is it maybe possible that you get access to
> http://opensource.freescale.com/git or another machine? A branch to pull
> from would be more convenient, because the series does not apply to
> mmc-next anymore, so an extra step to go "back in time" is needed.
> 
> (minor) When applying I got:
> 
> Applying: mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-pltfm device drivers self registered
> /home/wsa/Kernel/linux-2.6/.git/rebase-apply/patch:384: trailing whitespace.
> /home/wsa/Kernel/linux-2.6/.git/rebase-apply/patch:817: space before tab in indent.
>  	struct tegra_sdhci_platform_data *plat;
> /home/wsa/Kernel/linux-2.6/.git/rebase-apply/patch:867: trailing whitespace.
> 
> Applying: sdhci: rename sdhci-esdhc-imx.c to sdhci-esdhc.c
> /home/wsa/Kernel/linux-2.6/.git/rebase-apply/patch:780: trailing whitespace.
> 
> See later comments for further issues.
> 
Should I go for v3 right now to address the patch applying problems
and that ESDHC_IMX build issue, or hold for a while to see if you
have more comments on v2?

And what is your position on patch #5 which merges esdhc imx and mpc
support into one?  As Anton has voted a NO there, I would probably
drop the patch if there is another person has strong opinion to get
imx and mpc stay separated.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn