From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: remove "WP" from flag ESDHC_FLAG_GPIO_FOR_CD_WP Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:28:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20110614092812.GC5043@pengutronix.de> References: <1307702572-22066-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1307702572-22066-4-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="t0UkRYy7tHLRMCai" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:54783 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754593Ab1FNJ2Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:28:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1307702572-22066-4-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Shawn Guo Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Eric Benard , patches@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Chris Ball , Arnaud Patard --t0UkRYy7tHLRMCai Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:42:51PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > The use of flag ESDHC_FLAG_GPIO_FOR_CD_WP is all CD related. It does > not necessarily need to bother WP in the flag name. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo I'd just squash it into the next one? --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --t0UkRYy7tHLRMCai Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk33KawACgkQD27XaX1/VRt5GACffqVdpNR6LCycASRRPfoR8Mia GVgAnjpxVuM43SxSTnZxszt5JLAPhXMW =/+KF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --t0UkRYy7tHLRMCai--