From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Sebastian Rasmussen <sebras@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] MMC: Fix checkpatch warnings
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:48:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110619064837.GB1632@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308419432-18273-1-git-send-email-sebras@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2121 bytes --]
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Sebastian Rasmussen wrote:
Description of what was done is missing. How it was tested might be interesting
for such patches, too.
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Rasmussen <sebras@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 10 +++++-----
> drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 15 +++++----------
> drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c | 2 +-
> drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 5 +----
> drivers/mmc/core/bus.h | 2 +-
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 7 -------
> drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c | 2 +-
> drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 4 ----
> drivers/mmc/core/sd_ops.c | 1 -
> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c | 9 ++++-----
> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 10 +++++-----
> 11 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> index 1c7049a..48cf063 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/capability.h>
> #include <linux/compat.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
>
> #include <linux/mmc/ioctl.h>
> #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
> @@ -42,7 +43,6 @@
> #include <linux/mmc/sd.h>
>
> #include <asm/system.h>
> -#include <asm/uaccess.h>
>
> #include "queue.h"
>
> @@ -169,11 +169,11 @@ static ssize_t force_ro_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> int ret;
> char *end;
> struct mmc_blk_data *md = mmc_blk_get(dev_to_disk(dev));
> - unsigned long set = simple_strtoul(buf, &end, 0);
> - if (end == buf) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + unsigned long set
> +
> + ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &set)
> + if (ret < 0)
> goto out;
> - }
You change code here, while other changes are whitespace related. I think this
patch needs to be split up. If each patch does one thing, it will make
reviewing a lot easier, too.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-19 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-18 17:50 [PATCH 2/3] MMC: Fix checkpatch warnings Sebastian Rasmussen
2011-06-19 6:48 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110619064837.GB1632@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebras@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox