public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	svenkatr@ti.com, yinghai@kernel.org, cjb@laptop.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com,
	bhutchings@solarflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: make cardbus-bridge resources nice-to-have
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:50:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110621115043.064871db@jbarnes-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110621162321.GB22917@ram-laptop>

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:23:21 -0700
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:57:00AM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:47:17PM -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
> > > Allocate resources to cardbus bridge only after all other genuine
> > > resources requests are satisfied. Dont retry if resource allocation
> > > for cardbus-bridge fails.
> > 
> > Well, for those who use cardbus cards, cardbus resources aren't "nice to
> > have", they are absolutely required. Of course, not all cardbus cards need
> > as many resources as are currently assigned, so I wouldn't oppose a patch
> > which marks _some_ of the currently assigned resources as "nice to have".
> > But this approach -- 0 required, all "nice to have" -- seems wrong to me.
> 
> Do you know how much minimal resource is good enough?  The value, before
> this patch, was 256 for IO ports and  64M for memory.
> 
> BTW: If the BIOS has already assigned enough resources for all the devices on
> the system, no devices will be starved including the cardbus. The OS intervenes
> and is forced to make this hard choice only when it sees unassigned resources to
> some devices along with resource contention.

I just know this is going to trigger regressions, so I think Dominik's
concern is valid.  We'll have some existing machine with a device whose
resource was never assigned, but we didn't care because it was unused.
Now this code will try to give it some address space at the expense of
something that *is* being used.

But OTOH this will at least try to allocate *some* space to cardbus, we
just won't try as hard as with some other resources.  I'd mainly like
to avoid the situation Dominik pointed out, where we have perfectly
good cardbus resources assigned (unlike in Oliver's case) but they're
stolen for a bridge that may get a hotplugged device or some other
device that didn't have a BIOS assignment.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-21 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-20 22:47 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: fix cardbus and sriov regressions Ram Pai
2011-06-20 22:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: honor child buses add_size in hot plug configuration Ram Pai
2011-06-20 22:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI : ability to resize assigned pci-resource Ram Pai
2011-06-20 22:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: make SRIOV resources nice-to-have Ram Pai
2011-06-20 22:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI: make cardbus-bridge " Ram Pai
2011-06-21  7:57   ` Dominik Brodowski
2011-06-21 16:23     ` Ram Pai
2011-06-21 18:50       ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2011-06-21 21:36       ` Jesse Barnes
2011-06-21 22:13         ` Dominik Brodowski
2011-06-22  0:48           ` Ram Pai
2011-06-23 20:31             ` Jesse Barnes
2011-06-23 20:42               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-24 16:28                 ` Ram Pai
2011-06-24 23:45                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110621115043.064871db@jbarnes-desktop \
    --to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox