public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>,
	linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	Nickolay Nickolaev <nicknickolaev@gmail.com>,
	Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:12:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201106301512.46788.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309248717-14606-1-git-send-email-per.forlin@linaro.org>

On Tuesday 28 June 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
> How significant is the cache maintenance over head?
> It depends, the eMMC are much faster now
> compared to a few years ago and cache maintenance cost more due to
> multiple cache levels and speculative cache pre-fetch. In relation the
> cost for handling the caches have increased and is now a bottle neck
> dealing with fast eMMC together with DMA.
> 
> The intention for introducing non-blocking mmc requests is to minimize the
> time between a mmc request ends and another mmc request starts. In the
> current implementation the MMC controller is idle when dma_map_sg and
> dma_unmap_sg is processing. Introducing non-blocking mmc request makes it
> possible to prepare the caches for next job in parallel to an active
> mmc request.
> 
> This is done by making the issue_rw_rq() non-blocking.
> The increase in throughput is proportional to the time it takes to
> prepare (major part of preparations is dma_map_sg and dma_unmap_sg)
> a request and how fast the memory is. The faster the MMC/SD is
> the more significant the prepare request time becomes. Measurements on U5500
> and Panda on eMMC and SD shows significant performance gain for large
> reads when running DMA mode. In the PIO case the performance is unchanged.
> 
> There are two optional hooks pre_req() and post_req() that the host driver
> may implement in order to move work to before and after the actual mmc_request
> function is called. In the DMA case pre_req() may do dma_map_sg() and prepare
> the dma descriptor and post_req runs the dma_unmap_sg.

I think this looks good enough to merge into the linux-mmc tree, the code is
clean and the benefits are clear.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

One logical follow-up as both a cleanup and performance optimization would be
to get rid of the mmc_queue_thread completely. When mmc_blk_issue_rq() is
non-blocking always, you can call it directly from the mmc_request()
function, instead of waking up another thread to do it for you.

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-30 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-28  8:11 [PATCH v8 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Per Forlin
     [not found] ` <1309248717-14606-1-git-send-email-per.forlin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-28  8:11   ` [PATCH v8 02/12] omap_hsmmc: add support for pre_req and post_req Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11   ` [PATCH v8 03/12] mmci: implement pre_req() and post_req() Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11   ` [PATCH v8 04/12] mmc: mmc_test: add debugfs file to list all tests Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11   ` [PATCH v8 05/12] mmc: mmc_test: add test for non-blocking transfers Per Forlin
2011-07-01 13:29     ` Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11   ` [PATCH v8 06/12] mmc: mmc_test: test to measure how sg_len affect performance Per Forlin
2011-07-01 13:33     ` Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11   ` [PATCH v8 07/12] mmc: block: add member in mmc queue struct to hold request data Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11   ` [PATCH v8 08/12] mmc: block: add a block request prepare function Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11   ` [PATCH v8 09/12] mmc: block: move error code in issue_rw_rq to a separate function Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11   ` [PATCH v8 10/12] mmc: queue: add a second mmc queue request member Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11   ` [PATCH v8 11/12] mmc: core: add random fault injection Per Forlin
2011-06-28  8:11   ` [PATCH v8 12/12] mmc: block: add handling for two parallel block requests in issue_rw_rq Per Forlin
     [not found]     ` <1309248717-14606-13-git-send-email-per.forlin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-28  9:39       ` Per Forlin
2011-06-28  9:54   ` [PATCH v8 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency Kyungmin Park
2011-06-30 12:36 ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-06-30 13:11   ` S, Venkatraman
2011-06-30 13:12 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-06-30 13:30   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-01 16:44     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-02 12:29       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-02 19:37         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-03 20:53           ` Per Forlin
2011-07-04  1:07             ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-07-01 14:39 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201106301512.46788.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicknickolaev@gmail.com \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=per.forlin@linaro.org \
    --cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox