From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: add functions to enable/disable aggressive clock gating Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:33:27 +0300 Message-ID: <20110818113327.GY16790@intel.com> References: <20110817121914.GW16790@intel.com> <20110818103441.GX16790@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:49781 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755587Ab1HRLcz (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:32:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cjb@laptop.org On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 02:11:23PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Mika, do the patches to check host->clock in > (mmc|sdhci)_set_data_timeout() become useless after? > If so, probably you could revert them as well. IMHO these functions should work also when the clock is gated, so I suggest that we leave them as is for now.