From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Build breakage in sdhci-s3c Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:58:07 +0000 Message-ID: <20111202115807.GJ8245@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:55617 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754311Ab1LBL6J (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2011 06:58:09 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Sangwook Lee , Chris Ball Cc: Kukjin Kim , linaro-dev@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org The mmc and therefore -next currently fail to build on Samsung platforms due to commit 666b6a (mmc: sdhci-s3c: Add pm_caps into SD/MMC host) which added use of a new field pm_caps in the platform data without actually adding that field to the struct. I guess there's a separate patch floating about somewhere which adds the field but it's not in -next and both commits should be going in via the same tree to avoid bisection breakage - ideally both the field and its use should be added as part of a single commit.