From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5 v3] ESDHC: Power management for ESDHC Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 02:54:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20120103015453.GA3767@pengutronix.de> References: <1324958792-16742-1-git-send-email-r66093@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:38811 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750860Ab2ACBy4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2012 20:54:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball Cc: r66093@freescale.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Jerry Huang , Jiang Yutang --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:00:51PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote: > Wolfram, do you have time to look at this? Looks like we need to expose > suspend/resume hooks to -pltfm users for this use case -- I don't think > any esdhc code should be in sdhci-pltfm.c. (I don't mind writing the > patch if you agree that that's the correct solution here.) I won't have time to look at it, but what you say sounds reasonable to me. Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8CX+0ACgkQD27XaX1/VRvzbwCggv9QAA2VBppbIPmkei5GkcjH k5QAnRjkijr/N1O+PxFy6YTegcy1IgT7 =EV2Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24--