From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: system_nrt_wq, system suspend, and the freezer Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:37:57 -0800 Message-ID: <20120216163757.GI24986@google.com> References: <20120216162634.GE24986@google.com> <32626.1329405744@redhat.com> <2050.1329410151@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:43040 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752589Ab2BPQiC (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:38:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2050.1329410151@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: David Howells Cc: Alan Stern , Steve French , Chris Ball , David Airlie , Linux-pm mailing list , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, keyrings@linux-nfs.org On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:35:51PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > The key_garbage_collector work item is marked neither freezable nor > unfreezable that I can see. Heh, was too brief apparently. :) I was trying to say that if it doesn't require freezing, please don't put it on a freezable workqueue. So, IOW, I was just saying that nothing should change for key_garbage_collector. Thanks. -- tejun