From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: system_nrt_wq, system suspend, and the freezer Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:01:49 -0800 Message-ID: <20120216190149.GM24986@google.com> References: <20120216102728.230b99ba@poochiereds.net> <20120216162951.GF24986@google.com> <20120216135945.3dd3893a@samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120216135945.3dd3893a-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jeff Layton Cc: Alan Stern , Steve French , Chris Ball , David Airlie , David Howells , Linux-pm mailing list , linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mmc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, keyrings-6DNke4IJHB0gsBAKwltoeQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hello, Jeff. On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:59:45PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > The other problem here is that we really ought to be submitting the > write completion handler to a workqueue that has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set. > Since none of the public wq's have that then I guess we'll have to make > our own? Yeap, if a rescuer should be there, a separate wq is necessary. Thank you. -- tejun