public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Yusuke Goda <yusuke.goda.sx@renesas.com>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Cao Minh Hiep <hiepcm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sh_mmcif: mmc->f_max should be half of the bus clock
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:43:51 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120327014343.GA28782@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANqRtoSrg5Niezq5tLA+a3j9PUoTGoBUBtEBazjEKbCFXHhX1g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:17:21PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:45:30PM +0900, Yusuke Goda wrote:
> >> Hi Simon-san, Guennadi-san
> >>
> >> (2012/03/26 7:30), Simon Horman wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 07:06:31PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> mmc->f_max should be half of the bus clock.
> >> >>> And now that mmc->f_max is not equal to the bus clock the
> >> >>> latter should be used directly to calculate mmc->f_min.
> >> >>
> >> >> The patch seems correct as it stands, however, looking at it - does anyone
> >> >> understands why that "close to 400kHz" comment and such a complicated
> >> >> calculation? Shouldn't it be just host->clk / 512 always? Maybe this
> >> >> should be a separate patch, so, for this one
> >> >>
> >> >> Acked-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> >> >
> >> > Hi Guennadi,
> >> >
> >> > that code seems to date back to the original driver submission
> >> > made by Goda-san. I have CCed him as perhaps he recalls why
> >> > the code is like it is.
> >> I thought to get closer to 400kHz if possible.
> >> Probably even host->clk / 512 does not have any problem.
> >
> > Sorry for my ignorance, is ~400kHz desirable for some reason?
> 
> The 400kHz frequency is used during initialization of the SD card.
> Simply put, the SD frequency starts low out low and is then changed to
> something higher depending on the capability of the memory card and
> the host controller. Please have a look at the simplified SD
> specification for more details.

Thanks, got it.

Do you have a feeling of if it it worth trying to start with a value close
to 400kHz or if it would be better to simplify the code? I can try and
measure the difference in start up time for particular hardware
combinations, but I'm not sure how far that will get us.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-27  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-21  9:02 [PATCH 0/2] MMCIF Clock Fixes Simon Horman
2012-03-21  9:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sh_mmcif: double clock speed Simon Horman
2012-03-24 17:56   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-26  2:21     ` Simon Horman
2012-03-21  9:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sh_mmcif: mmc->f_max should be half of the bus clock Simon Horman
2012-03-24 18:06   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
     [not found]     ` <20120325223033.GA6860@verge.net.au>
2012-03-26  5:45       ` Yusuke Goda
2012-03-26  5:52         ` Simon Horman
2012-03-26  6:04           ` Yusuke Goda
2012-03-26  6:17           ` Magnus Damm
2012-03-26  7:04             ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-27  7:53               ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-27  8:14                 ` Simon Horman
2012-03-27  1:43             ` Simon Horman [this message]
2012-03-27  2:46               ` Magnus Damm
2012-03-27  3:20                 ` Chris Ball
2012-03-27  4:02                   ` Magnus Damm
2012-03-27  6:01                     ` Simon Horman
2012-03-27  6:37                       ` Magnus Damm
2012-03-27  7:12                         ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120327014343.GA28782@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=hiepcm@gmail.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=yusuke.goda.sx@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox