From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
To: Haijun Zhang <Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Jerry Huang <Chang-Ming.Huang@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Powerpc eSDHC: Use u64 to calculate the timeout value to avoid overflow
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:02:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121119050217.GB28159@lizard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353296310-10786-1-git-send-email-Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:38:28AM +0800, Haijun Zhang wrote:
> As some mmc cards need large timeout value usually a few seconds,
> so data timeout nanosecond will overflow with u32 variable and
> give the wrong timeout value, so use u64 will be safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang <Chang-Ming.Huang@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang <Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
Nope, you should not put my Signed-off-by here, I didn't sign on the
patch, neither I'm in patch's delivery path.
Preserving my exact tags (Acked-by or Reviewed-by) is important, they all
have different meanings.
You can refer to Documentation/SubmittingPatches, the document describes
each tag in detail.
Thanks,
Anton.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-19 5:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-19 3:38 [PATCH] Powerpc eSDHC: Use u64 to calculate the timeout value to avoid overflow Haijun Zhang
2012-11-19 3:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] Powerpc/eSDHC: Add limit to data and erase timeout value calculation Haijun Zhang
2012-11-19 5:04 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-19 5:23 ` Zhang Haijun-B42677
2012-11-19 5:33 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-19 5:57 ` Zhang Haijun-B42677
2012-11-19 3:38 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] Powerpc/eSDHC: Calculate the applicable mmc erase timeout value Haijun Zhang
2012-11-19 5:02 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-19 5:30 [PATCH 2/2 v3] Powerpc/eSDHC: Add limit to data and erase timeout value calculation Haijun Zhang
2012-11-19 5:31 ` [PATCH] Powerpc eSDHC: Use u64 to calculate the timeout value to avoid overflow Haijun Zhang
2012-11-25 19:49 ` Chris Ball
2012-11-12 4:45 Haijun Zhang
2012-11-19 0:39 ` Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121119050217.GB28159@lizard \
--to=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
--cc=Chang-Ming.Huang@freescale.com \
--cc=Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).