From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
To: Zhang Haijun-B42677 <B42677@freescale.com>
Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Huang Changming-R66093 <r66093@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Powerpc/eSDHC: Add limit to data and erase timeout value calculation
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:33:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121119053338.GA32383@lizard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99E897753B6F7048BD8CCDB4661D02E1165888@039-SN2MPN1-023.039d.mgd.msft.net>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 05:23:21AM +0000, Zhang Haijun-B42677 wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Powerpc/eSDHC: Add limit to data and erase
> > timeout value calculation
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:38:29AM +0800, Haijun Zhang wrote:
> > > Some cards apply too larg timeout value for host to response, So limit
> > > the maximum data transfer timeout value and maximum erase timeout
> > > value to aviod timeout issue.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang <Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang <Chang-Ming.Huang@freescale.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
> >
> > Ditto about the sign-off, it's inappropriate in this case.
>
>
> [Haijun: ] Sorry.
> So, replace signed-off-by with Acked-by?
For patches that got my Acked-by, place the Acked-by tag.
For patches that got my Reviewed-by, place the Reviewed-by tag.
> > [...]
> > > @@ -721,6 +722,10 @@ void mmc_set_data_timeout(struct mmc_data *data,
> > const struct mmc_card *card)
> > > data->timeout_ns = 100000000; /* 100ms */
> > > }
> > > }
> > > +
> > > + if (host->max_discard_to &&
> > > + host->max_discard_to < div_u64(data->timeout_ns, 1000000))
> >
> > Still wrong indentation.
>
> [Haijun: ] Did you mean here need two tabs not one ?
Yes.
> >
> > > + data->timeout_ns = (u64)host->max_discard_to * 1000000;
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_set_data_timeout);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-19 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-19 3:38 [PATCH] Powerpc eSDHC: Use u64 to calculate the timeout value to avoid overflow Haijun Zhang
2012-11-19 3:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] Powerpc/eSDHC: Add limit to data and erase timeout value calculation Haijun Zhang
2012-11-19 5:04 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-19 5:23 ` Zhang Haijun-B42677
2012-11-19 5:33 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2012-11-19 5:57 ` Zhang Haijun-B42677
2012-11-19 3:38 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] Powerpc/eSDHC: Calculate the applicable mmc erase timeout value Haijun Zhang
2012-11-19 5:02 ` [PATCH] Powerpc eSDHC: Use u64 to calculate the timeout value to avoid overflow Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121119053338.GA32383@lizard \
--to=cbouatmailru@gmail.com \
--cc=B42677@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r66093@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).