From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Standardise capability type Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:27:25 +0000 Message-ID: <20121119092725.GA553@gmail.com> References: <1352896551-17948-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <87haon99py.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:62964 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752889Ab2KSJ1b (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:27:31 -0500 Received: by mail-bk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id q16so1785880bkw.19 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:27:30 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87haon99py.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Lee,=20 >=20 > Pushed to mmc-next for 3.8 with a minor change: >=20 > On Wed, Nov 14 2012, Lee Jones wrote: > > There are discrepancies with regards to how MMC capabilities > > are carried throughout the subsystem. Let's standardise them > > to elevate any confusion. >=20 > I think you meant "eliminate" here. :) Thanks, No, I meant alleviate. :) Do you want me to re-submit, or have you fixed up? --=20 Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog