From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: mmci: Support non-power-of-two block sizes for
	ux500v2 variant
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:39:55 +0000
Message-ID: <20121221103955.GH14363@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20121121165048.GO3290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <CAFEEs1nb+UD+8_jsKvGKhyFqGDogN5wsmV30PnELqahTMDyRVA@mail.gmail.com> <20121122173708.GJ5764@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <50B34270.7070403@stericsson.com> <20121126102712.GC19440@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <50B349D3.2050806@stericsson.com> <CAFEEs1nZboGyAfpYQ2hUvp366FiS0=8u5zL6Vr1RfXac_Ls_dw@mail.gmail.com> <20121128171221.GF19440@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <CAPDyKFoq2f2tZqoKAjMjhA3yJFinXM25rJPCyiGaqHw=fEUoMg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPDyKFqg0Jb0mNW4riUa7XADKZpQSO0UAjSFKM_tnEOOG3LVxg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:35420 "EHLO
	caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751594Ab2LUKmK (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:42:10 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFqg0Jb0mNW4riUa7XADKZpQSO0UAjSFKM_tnEOOG3LVxg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Per Forlin <per.lkml@gmail.com>, Ulf HANSSON <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>, "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:36:32AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Just wanted to conclude on the way forward. Should we fixup pio_write
> according to how pio_read has been fixed, or should we adapt the check
> for misaligned buffers to what Per proposed?
> What do you prefer Russell?

It's really silly to have pio_read doing something that pio_write doesn't
do - they should have the same behaviour except for the differing data
flow direction.