From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add realtek USB card reader driver Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:02:11 +0000 Message-ID: <20140217100211.GE17875@lee--X1> References: <1392199238-14500-1-git-send-email-rogerable@realtek.com> <1392199238-14500-2-git-send-email-rogerable@realtek.com> <20140214094427.GA7380@lee--X1> <5301A786.8040607@realtek.com> <20140217082222.GA17875@lee--X1> <5301D369.5010100@realtek.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:50702 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751074AbaBQKCS (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 05:02:18 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k14so1960381wgh.1 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 02:02:17 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5301D369.5010100@realtek.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Roger Cc: Samuel Ortiz , Chris Ball , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Maxim Levitsky , Alex Dubov , Dan Carpenter , Ulf Hansson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org, wei_wang@realsil.com.cn, micky_ching@realsil.com.cn > >>>>From: Roger Tseng > >>>> > >>>>Realtek USB card reader provides a channel to transfer command or= data to flash > >>>>memory cards. This driver exports host instances for mmc and mems= tick subsystems > >>>>and handles basic works. > >>>> > >>>>Signed-off-by: Roger Tseng > >>>>--- > >>>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 10 + > >>>> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + > >>>> drivers/mfd/rtsx_usb.c | 760 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= +++++++++++++++ > >>>> include/linux/mfd/rtsx_usb.h | 628 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= +++++++ > >>>> 4 files changed, 1399 insertions(+) > >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rtsx_usb.c > >>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rtsx_usb.h > >>> > >>>Applied again, thanks. > >>> > >>Would you also apply patch 2/3 and 3/3 that to make the device full= y > >>operational for users? Or should they be applied by maintainers of > >>mmc/memstick subsystems? > >> > >>Chris, would you give some comment? > > > >I can apply them, but I need the other Maintainer Acks. > > > >If they are build orthogonal i.e. there are no build dependencies > >between them, it's probably better that they go into their associate= d > >trees separately. > > > I think it would be better to apply them together since the later > patches really depend on the 1st one,so now we are waiting for Acks > from mmc/memstick subsystems. When you say "depend on", do you mean as a build depenency, or won't run without the first patch applied? > But there is no one specified for "memstick/host/" in MAINTAINERS. > Could anyone else Ack this? --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog