From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/38] mmc: sdhci: hack up driver to make it more compliant with UHS-1 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:02:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20140428110259.GI26756@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20140423185534.GA26756@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140425123820.GA15179@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from gw-1.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.217]:54385 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755438AbaD1LDy (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:03:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Markus Pargmann , Chris Ball , linux-mmc , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:50:54PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 25 April 2014 14:38, Markus Pargmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:07:57PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > >> Patch suggested by Dong Aisheng , this avoids > >> additional clock start/stop cycles during the transition to 1.8V > >> signalling mode. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Russell King > > > > I tested the series on imx6s with a RIoT board. With this patch applied > > the RIoT board emmc does not work. Here is the output of the board: > > Hi Markus, > > Thanks for helping out testing! > > Does that mean patch 1->20 works fine for you? May I add your tested-by tag? Why should _you_ add someone elses tested-by tag to _my_ patches? I still wonder whether you understood anything that I've already said to you about the handling of this patch set. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.