Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: implement Driver Stage Register handling

Ulf Hansson
2014-08-14T10:29:05Z

On 14 August 2014 11:49, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Hello Ulf,
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:26:28AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 13 August 2014 17:44, Uwe Kleine-König
>> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>> > From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
>> >
>> > Some (e)MMC and SD cards implement a DSR register that allows to tune
>> > raise/fall times and drive strength of the CMD and DATA outputs.
>> > The values to use depend on the card in use and the host.
>> > It might be needed to reduce the drive strength to prevent voltage peaks
>> > above the host's specification.
>> >
>> > Implement a 'dsr' devicetree property that allows to specify the value
>> > to set the DSR to. For non-dt setups the new members of mmc_host can be
>> > set by board code.
>> >
>> > This patch was initially authored by Sascha Hauer. It contains
>> > improvements authored by Markus Niebel and Uwe Kleine-König.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
>> > Signed-off-by: Markus Niebel <Markus.Niebel@tq-group.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> > ---
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > earlier incarnations of this patch can be found at
>> >
>> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/272983.html
>> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-May/259281.html
>> >
>> > I need this functionallity on a machine where the default driver strength of
>> > the eMMC chip is too big for the SoC. It seems to work without adapting the
>> > drive strength, but the vendor reports that the DSR should be set to a certain
>> > value to prevent poor signal integrity and increased wearout.
>> >
>> > Best regards
>> > Uwe
>> >
>> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 2 ++
>> > drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 8 ++++++++
>> > drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 8 ++++++++
>> > drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> > drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.h | 1 +
>> > drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 8 ++++++++
>> > include/linux/mmc/card.h | 3 ++-
>> > include/linux/mmc/host.h | 3 +++
>> > 8 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
>> > index 3c18001dfd5d..05bac770b4d0 100644
>> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
>> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
>> > @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ Optional properties:
>> > - mmc-hs200-1_2v: eMMC HS200 mode(1.2V I/O) is supported
>> > - mmc-hs400-1_8v: eMMC HS400 mode(1.8V I/O) is supported
>> > - mmc-hs400-1_2v: eMMC HS400 mode(1.2V I/O) is supported
>> > +- dsr: Value the card's (optional) Driver Stage Register (DSR) should be
>> > + programmed with.
>>
>> Let's clarify that this is a 16 bit value.
> ok.
>
>> > *NOTE* on CD and WP polarity. To use common for all SD/MMC host controllers line
>> > polarity properties, we have to fix the meaning of the "normal" and "inverted"
>> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>> > index 95cceae96944..52e83f389428 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>> > @@ -452,6 +452,14 @@ int mmc_of_parse(struct mmc_host *host)
>> > if (of_find_property(np, "mmc-hs400-1_2v", &len))
>> > host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_HS400_1_2V | MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR;
>> >
>> > + if (of_find_property(np, "dsr", &len)) {
>> > + u32 tmp;
>> > +
>> > + of_property_read_u32(np, "dsr", &tmp);
>> > + host->dsr_req = 1;
>> > + host->dsr = (u16)tmp;
>> > + }
>> > +
>>
>> Let's simplify the above with just:
>> of_property_read_u16(np, "dsr", &host->dsr);
> ok.
>
>> > return 0;
>> >
>> > out:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> > index 793c6f7ddb04..fdc1ac1360c4 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> > @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ static int mmc_decode_csd(struct mmc_card *card)
>> > csd->read_partial = UNSTUFF_BITS(resp, 79, 1);
>> > csd->write_misalign = UNSTUFF_BITS(resp, 78, 1);
>> > csd->read_misalign = UNSTUFF_BITS(resp, 77, 1);
>> > + csd->dsr_imp = UNSTUFF_BITS(resp, 76, 1);
>> > csd->r2w_factor = UNSTUFF_BITS(resp, 26, 3);
>> > csd->write_blkbits = UNSTUFF_BITS(resp, 22, 4);
>> > csd->write_partial = UNSTUFF_BITS(resp, 21, 1);
>> > @@ -1273,6 +1274,13 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
>> > }
>> >
>> > /*
>> > + * handling only for cards supporting DSR and hosts requesting
>> > + * DSR configuration
>> > + */
>> > + if (card->csd.dsr_imp && host->dsr_req)
>>
>> We don't need host->dsr_req. Instead just check host->dsr.
> I think this doesn't work. What is your actual suggestion?
>
> if (card->csd.dsr_imp && host->dsr)
>
> ? The intended semantic is that if the device tree has:
>
> dsr = <$somevalue>;
>
> the DSR is written, and if there is no such property, DSR is unhandled.
> If you just check for host->dsr being != 0, how to differenciate between
>
> dsr = <0>;

I didn't think that was a valid mask? If so, you right!

Kind regards
Uffe