From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] clk: sunxi: Improve MMC clocks support Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:55:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20140926065507.GO15315@lukather> References: <1410466706-27386-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20140922113133.GF15315@lukather> <20140926004218.19023.88602@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G23JYFG0d77Z6i/3" Return-path: Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9]:59625 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752976AbaIZHAG (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2014 03:00:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140926004218.19023.88602@quantum> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Turquette Cc: Hans de Goede , Emilio Lopez , chris@printf.net, david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, wens@csie.org --G23JYFG0d77Z6i/3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mike, On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 05:42:18PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Maxime Ripard (2014-09-22 04:31:33) > > Mike, > >=20 > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:18:14PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > >=20 > > > Here is an attempt at improving the MMC clock support in the Allwinner > > > SoCs. > > >=20 > > > Until now, the MMC clocks were having a custom phase function that was > > > directly setting an obscure value in the right register, because we > > > were not really having any idea of what these values were. > > >=20 > > > Now that we have more informations, we can introduce a common function > > > call to get and set the phase of a particular clock, and use this in > > > both our provider and our client. > >=20 > > It would be great that we have that custom phase API out of the kernel > > for 3.18, and you were one of the greatest supporters to that idea, > > could we please have your view on this? >=20 > Patches all look good to me. Did you want the whole series to go through > the clk tree? I guess it would be where it most make sense yes. > If so we'll need an Ack for the MMC patch and for the ARM DTS > patches as well. We already have an Ack from Ulf on the MMC patch, and I'm the maintainer of the DTS involved, so we should be ok :) Thanks! Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --G23JYFG0d77Z6i/3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUJQ3LAAoJEBx+YmzsjxAgmwEP/RaTxW7Bk80ewS8n+5x1iY5Z ZoU9KSH19up57Bi2YdjqOQAPYkiORR3P6ndaaWj5ggFNFdKVyZN6NaP3FsLq8iOo Alfwl4cY/KH5KiqJ+VFq7mziQMU+TcRmjGEE8dnhS+K6YrNsPe8azUyDLTr/V24r J3oIAZ73qKiu2D7sTCJuhgBcptj7usOYWybKlgzCkmIhgJgcJDVKwrm2l2POgqVt HmxED/6oCvZxlrrKoCzLchkMBozDvGwXf4c700VTpmunQwB0B1nv/b1Nk008p7Lj NiTOYb6VQstkrOgCLCohqvtAoLwydhRT0a9ouxAHUPzPTCSiTl/KaeRz8UFVuCp/ s3trQm6PJiQjhnEVt9b2NEbuAXaMarIZOhveLg7raF6npnB9w1TAc+zhthD/ax93 lI0Z00nj34HuzTA0L75ITCayQDidXpg3JsjopBFkeoU+FkVI7YjZMsT2LlV58DwI Bia0vE8+t/Zl4ZlGAcm1j9aiSd8PNiWNnKWY7h/rvx+sOmtVPEypB6aFPKBjh7NF bx7ydv9cg39HFSdNH+8lKQ2I+/GGJEVNe2kxWl0fiKgsUnjj6FFh1OFbR8Eb0wBh yQ1C28aloEugSOOQN1XsnjsdZLtQHRR7PI1bYU4K2JQzCUKAOAC4aJkKRoamDg9v xzH+nlY4tIA1r1gFwhcf =7oy/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G23JYFG0d77Z6i/3--