From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dong Aisheng Subject: Re: [patch] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: silence a false curly braces warning Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:14:13 +0800 Message-ID: <20150227071410.GA18208@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net> References: <20150226203755.GD6820@mwanda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Received: from mail-bn1bon0132.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.111.132]:30048 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750804AbbB0HS5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:18:57 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150226203755.GD6820@mwanda> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Chris Ball , Ulf Hansson , Russell King , Shawn Guo , Dirk Behme , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:37:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Static checkers suggest that probably we intended to put curly braces > around the writel() to make it part of the else path. But, I think > actually the indenting is off and the code works fine as is. > > The stray tab was introduced in 0322191e6298 ('mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add > sd3.0 SDR clock tuning support') > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > Yes, that's a mistake. Thanks for the finding. Acked-by: Dong Aisheng Regards Dong Aisheng > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > index 10ef824..9cce5cf 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg) > new_val |= ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_FRC_SDCLK_ON; > else > new_val &= ~ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_FRC_SDCLK_ON; > - writel(new_val, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC); > + writel(new_val, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC); > return; > case SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2: > new_val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);