From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: mmc: core: Increase delay for voltage to stabilize from 3.3V to 1.8V Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 16:32:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20150513153246.GY2761@sirena.org.uk> References: <1431467171-12937-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <20150513110915.GG3066@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="72btQdUC6twB1rwh" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Doug Anderson , linux-mmc , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Johan Rudholm , Adrian Hunter , Tim Kryger , Javier Martinez Canillas , Andrew Gabbasov , Sascha Hauer , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org --72btQdUC6twB1rwh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 03:06:47PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 13 May 2015 at 13:09, Mark Brown wrote: > > Right, and this is probably going beyond the delays that the regulator > > API is handling since it's not something the regulator hardware is > > actively managing. > Thanks for elaborating from the regulator perspective. So may I apply > your ack for this one? I guess, yes. --72btQdUC6twB1rwh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVU26dAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQUIYH/3eMeM6EavF6dWjGwLZBaf80 GKCuD8peZkrTCCasEblooxND/sBPk+9AoRskhJ/lGwhk4EW3yAn8pBr/inrNTNYG kEy7j8ZcdxOBjxgvra/sQLJ8J9NS1Yj3PeJ2C6o1p1VvDURqayyBuMNPdWpPORht C+t+fHCi0DuNCdVAPimTNvu3VfrLrItddx3bRTanyYn8VIu7tCnSAdYtQP3GAEiO 0F90VEJXeaQo6hXEDypNtviC49c3TLd0DWUmgLeRXXA5uTpe6mwBPFwyEfYe4QPe XGntr4bQX6jxkksPIaQ5NKNafOk/iVln+nX4fwxjV5o/fpPtOOV/uNxb1PhzGa4= =D3Kx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --72btQdUC6twB1rwh--