From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/24] mmc: sdhci: avoid unnecessary mapping/unmapping of align buffer
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 12:29:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160102122919.GX8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56828E46.5090600@intel.com>
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 03:44:38PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 21/12/15 13:41, Russell King wrote:
> > Unnecessarily mapping and unmapping the align buffer for SD cards is
> > expensive: performance measurements on iMX6 show that this gives a hit
> > of 10% on hdparm buffered disk reads.
> >
> > MMC/SD card IO comes from the mm/vfs which gives us page based IO, so
> > for this case, the align buffer is not going to be used. However, we
> > still map and unmap this buffer.
> >
> > Eliminate this by switching the align buffer to be a DMA coherent
> > buffer, which needs no DMA maintenance to access the buffer.
>
> Did you consider putting the align buffer in the same allocation
> as the adma_table?
It's not clear whether host->adma_table_sz would be appropriately
aligned.
> > @@ -3003,6 +2972,10 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> > host->adma_table_sz,
> > &host->adma_addr,
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > + host->align_buffer = dma_alloc_coherent(mmc_dev(mmc),
> > + host->align_buffer_sz,
> > + &host->align_addr,
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > host->align_buffer = kmalloc(host->align_buffer_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> kmalloc line is still there
Good catch, thanks.
> > +
> > + /* dma_alloc_coherent returns page aligned and sized buffers */
> > + BUG_ON(host->align_addr & host->align_mask);
>
> It would be nicer not to have any BUG_ON()
This is a situation that should _never_ occur (if it does, then the
dma_alloc_coherent() implementation is violating the API requirements,
which are to return a page-sized page-aligned buffer.) I guess it
could be a WARN_ON(), but if it fails we're likely to cause data
corruption. So, a WARN_ON() and failing the probe seems more
appropriate - but then that means yet more messy cleanup in an already
messy part of the driver.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-02 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-21 11:39 [PATCH v2 00/24] MMC/SDHCI fixes Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] mmc: core: shut up "voltage-ranges unspecified" pr_info() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] mmc: core: improve mmc_of_parse_voltage() to return better status Russell King
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] mmc: block: shut up "retrying because a re-tune was needed" message Russell King
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] mmc: core: report tuning command execution failure reason Russell King
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] mmc: sdhci: move initialisation of command error member Russell King
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] mmc: sdhci: clean up command error handling Russell King
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] mmc: sdhci: command response CRC " Russell King
2015-12-29 13:08 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-01-02 12:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-04 11:24 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-01-26 13:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] mmc: sdhci: avoid unnecessary mapping/unmapping of align buffer Russell King
2015-12-29 13:44 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-01-02 12:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2016-01-02 14:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-04 11:41 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-01-04 11:50 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-01-04 11:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] mmc: sdhci: clean up coding style in sdhci_adma_table_pre() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] mmc: sdhci: avoid walking SG list for writes Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] mmc: sdhci: factor out common DMA cleanup in sdhci_finish_data() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] mmc: sdhci: move sdhci_pre_dma_transfer() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] mmc: sdhci: factor out sdhci_pre_dma_transfer() from sdhci_adma_table_pre() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] mmc: sdhci: pass the cookie into sdhci_pre_dma_transfer() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] mmc: sdhci: always unmap a mapped data transfer in sdhci_post_req() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] mmc: sdhci: clean up host cookie handling Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] mmc: sdhci: plug DMA mapping leak on error Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] mmc: sdhci-pxav3: fix higher speed mode capabilities Russell King
2015-12-21 11:54 ` Marcin Wojtas
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] mmc: sdhci: further fix for DMA unmapping in sdhci_post_req() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] mmc: sdhci: fix data timeout (part 1) Russell King
2015-12-21 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] mmc: sdhci: fix data timeout (part 2) Russell King
2015-12-21 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] mmc: sdhci: prepare DMA address/size quirk handling consolidation Russell King
2015-12-21 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] mmc: sdhci: consolidate the DMA/ADMA size/address quicks Russell King
2015-12-21 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] mmc: sdhci: further code simplication Russell King
2015-12-21 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] MMC/SDHCI fixes Ulf Hansson
2015-12-21 12:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-21 13:23 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-12-21 13:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-21 13:59 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-12-22 11:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-12-22 11:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-21 12:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160102122919.GX8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).