From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/3] ARM: dts: r8a7790: lager: Enable UHS-I SDR-104 Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:44:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20160511124441.GA1716@katana> References: <1462859524-28522-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <1462859524-28522-4-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Magnus Damm Cc: Simon Horman , Ian Molton , Ulf Hansson , Wolfram Sang , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > SDR104) while SDHI2 and SDHI3 do not have this hardware feature. How > is this difference handled today? We read out the version register. (That reminds me I have a documentation patch for that lying around...) --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXMyk5AAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2zq0QAIflxIOZEgBIfYon9caqhpx/ ROD/21QtUzTm7ufS6E1rFBzjpmJDjib3Y6kl+TzvIF7+8nZOt1s1oHxzGXNwWdAS +fue08X4j+5UDqCLTCjVWNpbZcuIXXRvRr9t8BWXQ2XNaSZ2B+MiLiyPGH+wLAEx Tu0F/6yqfp8n5QqzQZmewWChKV7c3BzatEsEXts2iNYqa6sItYJYlFPkZmn7OKHW KEgSVVMJPYniilo8YUAvHjZA2Cu475JhvcE/u4gCUxrGuRttjyUypumsCWmW355s 6g27ZiQtHsWA1ZUD3mnknLPv9B+QZhwYl0l54JlhazPbUv/GjSuM2lt7rin+f1DV fNw/PUcPJlP5eM5L3SbLfzMpTeyE35qo0OZn9jgU6m2TR1hBzP5w9DSgVSoHDd8r /3qKevXoT9PClNpL/5iKuXcStmWRpfN1j+91sM325trUbA14nFcvNtciGu3k2bR2 cr1fGUYf2mWRbcgleZThq2loI8vFRouGGNENe/XQnoeCEs5/Mzqs3ce6RKVKWLMo WNnpt7BfACU9yqcbwLG4+HvIyglMzQiNlHgIlYRvgil7ObdnqTEVHM3euzs4lkOG FxrlUurCyapj+z7LtUaFSSGpPudx7XK96q0DtRzzZkwYcQ5U4lz7l+hcOjKQ6zK4 NR+1AEu6zxaLtM0yP4hV =MKzX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--