From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Don Zickus Subject: Re: RTS5227 errors on mount Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:41:58 -0400 Message-ID: <20160919134158.GW98438@redhat.com> References: <20160901214047.GV98438@redhat.com> <20160915151129.GM98438@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60944 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756055AbcISNmB (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:42:01 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Ulf Hansson Cc: linux-mmc On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 11:03:55AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 15 September 2016 at 17:11, Don Zickus wrote: > > Hi Ulf, > > > > My emails to Micky seem to get blocked. Is there a better person to contact > > about the rts5227 chip? > > Sorry, I don't know. > > Do you think this is a regression? Care to do a bisect? I can try bisecting but I don't think it is a regression. The hardware does recover correctly (aborts the transaction, reset the device, and retry). I was just trying to see if there was some incorrect calculations made when setting voltage levels or other chip configurations. But I don't have the specs to know how things are supposed to work. For right now it is just an' error' message that appears in our log that I was trying to get rid of. I don't see any loss of data, which is good. I was hoping Micky would just be able to give a quick answer or something. I will poke at bisection to see if anything useful comes up. Cheers, Don