From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/10] dt: bindings: Add bindings for Marvell Xenon SD Host Controller Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:48:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20161124104858.3604c11d@free-electrons.com> References: <4031579.CBE32NHUoW@wuerfel> <877f7tmduw.fsf@free-electrons.com> <28082657.RK5ubAe11Q@wuerfel> <8737ihmctr.fsf@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8737ihmctr.fsf-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Gregory CLEMENT Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Jimmy Xu , Andrew Lunn , Ulf Hansson , Romain Perier , Liuliu Zhao , Peng Zhu , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Nadav Haklai , Ziji Hu , Victor Gu , Doug Jones , Jisheng Zhang , Yehuda Yitschak , Marcin Wojtas , Xueping Liu , Hilbert Zhang , Shiwu Zhang , Yu Cao , Sebastian Hesselbarth List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:44:48 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > "A single Xenon IP can support multiple slots. > Each slot acts as an independent SDHC. It owns independent resources, such > as register sets clock and PHY. > Each slot should have an independent device tree node." I think this wording is still very confusing, and continues to cause confusion. We should just state that each Xenon controller supports a single slot, and that's it. The text still says "a single Xenon IP can support multiple slots", which continues to cause confusion. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html