public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [bug report] mmc: block: return errorcode from mmc_sd_num_wr_blocks()
@ 2017-02-07  8:23 Dan Carpenter
  2017-02-13 14:41 ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-02-07  8:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linus.walleij; +Cc: linux-mmc

Hello Linus Walleij,

The patch 9a5e7ddc7954: "mmc: block: return errorcode from
mmc_sd_num_wr_blocks()" from Feb 1, 2017, leads to the following
static checker warning:

	drivers/mmc/core/block.c:1589 mmc_blk_rw_cmd_err()
	error: uninitialized symbol 'blocks'.

drivers/mmc/core/block.c
   766  static int mmc_sd_num_wr_blocks(struct mmc_card *card, u32 *written_blocks)
   767  {
   768          int err;
   769          u32 result;
   770          __be32 *blocks;
   771  
   772          struct mmc_request mrq = {};
   773          struct mmc_command cmd = {};
   774          struct mmc_data data = {};
   775  
   776          struct scatterlist sg;
   777  
   778          cmd.opcode = MMC_APP_CMD;
   779          cmd.arg = card->rca << 16;
   780          cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
   781  
   782          err = mmc_wait_for_cmd(card->host, &cmd, 0);
   783          if (err)
   784                  return err;
   785          if (!mmc_host_is_spi(card->host) && !(cmd.resp[0] & R1_APP_CMD))
   786                  return 0;

This is supposed to be "return -EIO", I suspect.  The caller expects
that *written_blocks is initialized if we return zero.

   787  
   788          memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_command));
   789  
   790          cmd.opcode = SD_APP_SEND_NUM_WR_BLKS;
   791          cmd.arg = 0;
   792          cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC;
   793  

regards,
dan carpenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [bug report] mmc: block: return errorcode from mmc_sd_num_wr_blocks()
  2017-02-07  8:23 [bug report] mmc: block: return errorcode from mmc_sd_num_wr_blocks() Dan Carpenter
@ 2017-02-13 14:41 ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2017-02-13 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:

>    785          if (!mmc_host_is_spi(card->host) && !(cmd.resp[0] & R1_APP_CMD))
>    786                  return 0;
>
> This is supposed to be "return -EIO", I suspect.  The caller expects
> that *written_blocks is initialized if we return zero.

Indeed. I sent a fixup patch.

Thank you so much for noticing this and reporting!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-13 14:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-07  8:23 [bug report] mmc: block: return errorcode from mmc_sd_num_wr_blocks() Dan Carpenter
2017-02-13 14:41 ` Linus Walleij

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox