From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: host: tmio: fill in response from auto cmd12
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:02:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170215150240.GA1430@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFobQ07u_xUgpm7iQRJkCqVS9_6JvyoTDhqLM-R3qCFeGQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1271 bytes --]
> > I see. Ulf, do you think it makes sense to extend the condition when to
> > call mmc_blk_cmd_recovery() with checking if stop.resp[0] has one of the
> > R1_* bits set which are marked with 'ex' (and probably 'erx', too)? I
> > agree with Shimoda-san, that the core is a good place to do it, since it
> > is about parsing the R1 and not the status bits of the host hardware.
>
> The method we use to indicate a stop command error to the mmc core, is
> to set ->stop.error in the host driver before completing the request.
> Perhaps set it to -EIO or -EILSEQ.
>
> In that way mmc_blk_err_check() sees the error and invokes the
> mmc_blk_cmd_recovery() to deal with it (response parsing etc).
>
> Does that work for you?
It would work, yes. Since R1 response format is hardware independent, I
wondered if checking for ECC errors wouldn't be better suited in the
core. We roughly need something like this:
if (stop.resp[0] & R1_CARD_ECC_FAILED)
stop.error = -EIO;
We can copy this into every driver, of course. Yet, I wondered if we
couldn't have a helper function mapping the R1 error bits to an
apropriate error value and call that just before the check in
mmc_blk_err_check().
Do you get what I mean?
Thanks,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-15 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-13 18:03 [PATCH v2 0/4] mmc: host: tmio: properly report status from autocmd12 Wolfram Sang
2017-02-13 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mmc: host: tmio: use defines for CTL_STOP_INTERNAL_ACTION values Wolfram Sang
2017-02-13 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mmc: host: tmio: fix minor typos in comments Wolfram Sang
2017-02-16 15:03 ` Simon Horman
2017-02-13 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mmc: host: tmio: don't BUG on unsupported stop commands Wolfram Sang
2017-02-13 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: host: tmio: fill in response from auto cmd12 Wolfram Sang
2017-02-14 10:06 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2017-02-14 10:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-02-15 10:19 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-02-15 15:02 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2017-02-16 7:57 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-02-16 8:37 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-02-16 8:57 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170215150240.GA1430@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=horms+renesas@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox