From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@bitwise.fi>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mmc: sdhci: clarify the get_timeout_clock callback
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:25:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170316132536.7b644795@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489627251-93539-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:20:51 +0800 Shawn Lin wrote:
> Currently the get_timeout_clock callabck doesn't clearly
> have a statment that it needs the variant drivers to return
> the timeout clock rate in KHz if the SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CLK_UNIT
> isn't present, otherwise the variant drivers should return it
> in KHz. So actually sdhci-of-arasan return the wrong value found
> by Anssi[1]. It's also very likely that further variant drivers which
> are going to use this callback will be confused by this situation.
> Given the fact that modem sdhci variant hosts are very prone to get
> the timeout clock from common clock framework(actuall the only three
> users did that), it's more nature to return the value in Hz and we
> make a explicit comment there. Then we put the unit conversion inside
> the sdhci core. Thus will improve the code and prevent further misues.
>
> [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9569431/
I think we need a blank line here
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Cc: Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@bitwise.fi>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
>
This blank line need to be removed.
> Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - rebased on -next
> - add Masahiro's ack for sdhci-cadence
>
> Changes in v3:
> - squash all the patches into one to keep bisectability
> - fix wrong return value of sdhci-cadence
> - slight improve the condition check to avoid the complaint of
> checkpatch
>
> Changes in v2:
> - fix the comment and make it return in Hz
>
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 17 +----------------
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c
> index 316cfec..7baeeaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c
> @@ -103,9 +103,9 @@ static unsigned int sdhci_cdns_get_timeout_clock(struct sdhci_host *host)
> {
> /*
> * Cadence's spec says the Timeout Clock Frequency is the same as the
> - * Base Clock Frequency. Divide it by 1000 to return a value in kHz.
> + * Base Clock Frequency.
> */
> - return host->max_clk / 1000;
> + return host->max_clk;
> }
>
> static void sdhci_cdns_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
> index 1cfd7f9..c52f153 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
> @@ -157,21 +157,6 @@ static int sdhci_arasan_syscon_write(struct sdhci_host *host,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static unsigned int sdhci_arasan_get_timeout_clock(struct sdhci_host *host)
> -{
> - unsigned long freq;
> - struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> -
> - /* SDHCI timeout clock is in kHz */
> - freq = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk), 1000);
> -
> - /* or in MHz */
> - if (host->caps & SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CLK_UNIT)
> - freq = DIV_ROUND_UP(freq, 1000);
> -
> - return freq;
> -}
> -
> static void sdhci_arasan_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
> {
> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> @@ -286,7 +271,7 @@ static int sdhci_arasan_voltage_switch(struct mmc_host *mmc,
> static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_arasan_ops = {
> .set_clock = sdhci_arasan_set_clock,
> .get_max_clock = sdhci_pltfm_clk_get_max_clock,
> - .get_timeout_clock = sdhci_arasan_get_timeout_clock,
> + .get_timeout_clock = sdhci_pltfm_clk_get_max_clock,
> .set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> .reset = sdhci_arasan_reset,
> .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 6fdd7a7..f73494e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -3289,20 +3289,22 @@ int sdhci_setup_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> if (!(host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK)) {
> host->timeout_clk = (host->caps & SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CLK_MASK) >>
> SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CLK_SHIFT;
> +
> + if (host->caps & SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CLK_UNIT)
> + host->timeout_clk *= 1000;
> +
> if (host->timeout_clk == 0) {
> - if (host->ops->get_timeout_clock) {
> - host->timeout_clk =
> - host->ops->get_timeout_clock(host);
> - } else {
> + if (unlikely(!host->ops->get_timeout_clock)) {
> pr_err("%s: Hardware doesn't specify timeout clock frequency.\n",
> mmc_hostname(mmc));
> ret = -ENODEV;
> goto undma;
> }
> - }
>
> - if (host->caps & SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CLK_UNIT)
> - host->timeout_clk *= 1000;
> + host->timeout_clk =
> + DIV_ROUND_UP(host->ops->get_timeout_clock(host),
> + 1000);
> + }
>
> if (override_timeout_clk)
> host->timeout_clk = override_timeout_clk;
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> index edf3adf..27c252c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> @@ -547,6 +547,7 @@ struct sdhci_ops {
> int (*enable_dma)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> unsigned int (*get_max_clock)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> unsigned int (*get_min_clock)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> + /* get_timeout_clock should return clk rate in unit of Hz */
> unsigned int (*get_timeout_clock)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> unsigned int (*get_max_timeout_count)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> void (*set_timeout)(struct sdhci_host *host,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-16 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-16 1:20 [PATCH v4] mmc: sdhci: clarify the get_timeout_clock callback Shawn Lin
2017-03-16 5:25 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2017-03-16 7:16 ` Shawn Lin
2017-03-16 8:31 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-03-16 8:46 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-16 8:54 ` Shawn Lin
2017-03-16 8:53 ` Shawn Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170316132536.7b644795@xhacker \
--to=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=anssi.hannula@bitwise.fi \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox