From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, carlo@caione.org, khilman@baylibre.com,
ben-linux@fluff.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, vireshk@kernel.org,
maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, wens@csie.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mmc: Handle platform_get_irq's error checking and return
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 08:19:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171118081947.GX31757@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1510950502-22565-1-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 01:58:16AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct and and we must check its return value.
IRQ 0 is not a valid interrupt. The correct test here is <= 0.
Please rework your patches for this.
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-18 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-17 20:28 [PATCH 0/6] mmc: Handle platform_get_irq's error checking and return Arvind Yadav
2017-11-17 20:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] mmc: meson-gx-mmc: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking Arvind Yadav
2017-12-07 0:55 ` Kevin Hilman
2017-11-17 20:28 ` [PATCH 2/6] mmc: s3cmci: " Arvind Yadav
2017-11-17 20:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Handle return value of platform_get_irq Arvind Yadav
2017-11-17 20:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] mmc: sdhci-spear: " Arvind Yadav
2017-11-20 5:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-20 6:43 ` Arvind Yadav
2017-11-17 20:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] mmc: sh_mmcif: " Arvind Yadav
2017-11-17 20:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] mmc: sunxi-mmc: " Arvind Yadav
2017-11-18 8:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171118081947.GX31757@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=carlo@caione.org \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox