From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
Yong Mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] mmc: core: Clarify sdio_irq_pending flag for MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:34:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190905003451.GI70797@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190903142207.5825-6-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:22:01PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> In the single SDIO IRQ handler case, the sdio_irq_pending flag is used to
> avoid reading the SDIO_CCCR_INTx register and instead immediately call the
> SDIO func's >irq_handler() callback.
>
> To clarify the use behind the flag for the MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD case,
> let's set the flag from inside sdio_signal_irq(), rather from
> sdio_run_irqs(). Moreover, let's also reset the flag when the SDIO IRQ have
> been properly processed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
> index f75043266984..0962a4357d54 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static int process_sdio_pending_irqs(struct mmc_host *host)
> {
> struct mmc_card *card = host->card;
> int i, ret, count;
> + bool sdio_irq_pending = host->sdio_irq_pending;
> unsigned char pending;
> struct sdio_func *func;
>
> @@ -66,13 +67,16 @@ static int process_sdio_pending_irqs(struct mmc_host *host)
> if (mmc_card_suspended(card))
> return 0;
>
> + /* Clear the flag to indicate that we have processed the IRQ. */
> + host->sdio_irq_pending = false;
> +
It's not entirely true that we have processed the IRQ,
the sdio_get_pending_irqs() below could fail and we'd return. However
I guess if it comes to that we are in a pretty bad shape already and
the value of the flag doesn't really matter.
> /*
> * Optimization, if there is only 1 function interrupt registered
> * and we know an IRQ was signaled then call irq handler directly.
> * Otherwise do the full probe.
> */
> func = card->sdio_single_irq;
> - if (func && host->sdio_irq_pending) {
> + if (func && sdio_irq_pending) {
> func->irq_handler(func);
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -110,7 +114,6 @@ static void sdio_run_irqs(struct mmc_host *host)
> {
> mmc_claim_host(host);
> if (host->sdio_irqs) {
> - host->sdio_irq_pending = true;
> process_sdio_pending_irqs(host);
> if (host->ops->ack_sdio_irq)
> host->ops->ack_sdio_irq(host);
> @@ -128,6 +131,7 @@ void sdio_irq_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> void sdio_signal_irq(struct mmc_host *host)
> {
> + host->sdio_irq_pending = true;
> queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &host->sdio_irq_work, 0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdio_signal_irq);
> @@ -173,7 +177,6 @@ static int sdio_irq_thread(void *_host)
> if (ret)
> break;
> ret = process_sdio_pending_irqs(host);
> - host->sdio_irq_pending = false;
> mmc_release_host(host);
>
> /*
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-05 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-03 14:21 [PATCH 00/11] mmc: core: PM fixes/improvements for SDIO IRQs Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 01/11] mmc: core: Add helper function to indicate if SDIO IRQs is enabled Ulf Hansson
2019-09-04 23:58 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05 7:28 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 02/11] mmc: dw_mmc: Re-store SDIO IRQs mask at system resume Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 0:14 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05 7:29 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 17:01 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05 23:47 ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-06 9:19 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-06 21:37 ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 03/11] mmc: mtk-sd: " Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 04/11] mmc: core: Move code to get pending SDIO IRQs to a function Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 05/11] mmc: core: Clarify sdio_irq_pending flag for MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 0:34 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2019-09-05 7:29 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 23:47 ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-06 9:19 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-06 21:30 ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-08 9:11 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 06/11] mmc: core: Clarify that the ->ack_sdio_irq() callback is mandatory Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 17:33 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 07/11] mmc: core: WARN if SDIO IRQs are enabled for non-powered card in suspend Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 17:38 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 08/11] mmc: core: Fixup processing of SDIO IRQs during system suspend/resume Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 18:43 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-06 9:42 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 23:48 ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-06 9:42 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 09/11] mmc: sdhci: Drop redundant check in sdhci_ack_sdio_irq() Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 18:57 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 10/11] mmc: sdhci: Drop redundant code for SDIO IRQs Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 11/11] mmc: sdhci: Convert to use sdio_irq_enabled() Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 19:02 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190905003451.GI70797@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=yong.mao@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).