From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
Takeshi Saito <takeshi.saito.xv@renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add manual correction
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:18:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191213161841.GA1208@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdV8+35xLVqAX1mpU1gBKhkw6nBRFwdJwBF0_UXJPh18+g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 881 bytes --]
Hi Geert,
> > > BTW, why is tap_set unsigned long instead of unsigned int?
> >
> > Because we use bitmap functions on it, and those have all unsigned long
> > as arguments.
>
> Do we? I only see bitops on host->taps?
Point taken on this one...
>
> > > And perhaps it should be moved from host to priv?
> >
> > That would be great, but other tap_* variables are still used in
> > tmio_mmc_core.c. We maybe can refactor all tap handling into
> > renesas_sdhi_core.c meanwhile, but this is a seperate issue.
>
> tap_num is shared by the Renesas and TMIO code.
> tap_set is Renesas-specific.
... here however, I think we should keep all tap_* related variables
close together. The driver is messy enough as is. Investigation if all
of that code could be moved to renesas_sdhi_core, though, seems very
useful.
Thanks for the comments!
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-13 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-03 20:32 [RFC PATCH 0/2] mmc: renesas_sdhi: add manual correction Wolfram Sang
2019-12-03 20:32 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add " Wolfram Sang
2019-12-04 9:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-12-10 22:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-12-11 7:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-12-13 16:18 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2019-12-09 6:42 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-12-03 20:33 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: renesas_sdhi: enfore manual correction for Gen3 Wolfram Sang
2019-12-04 9:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-12-09 7:00 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-12-03 20:33 ` [RFC PATCH 3/2] mmc: renesas_sdhi: remove double clear of automatic correction Wolfram Sang
2019-12-09 7:01 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-12-10 22:32 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] mmc: renesas_sdhi: add manual correction Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191213161841.GA1208@ninjato \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=takeshi.saito.xv@renesas.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox