From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5E4C2D0DB for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 21:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0039F215A4 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 21:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="P4GDqsD+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727572AbgA3ViR (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 16:38:17 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f68.google.com ([209.85.216.68]:40586 "EHLO mail-pj1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727566AbgA3ViR (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 16:38:17 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f68.google.com with SMTP id 12so1900411pjb.5 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:38:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EwmsKAAR9EZeJAmAlDaaBhS2SFQYknZY+oQh1g/QCAE=; b=P4GDqsD+SXwiCy9JUOoM9+wWOVmgS78wb+4/C1tpIyPq02GJCeJnxqEEgOF3HbYOlI BYIwnDL/eJZrdTMcTFAD2q8tKn8VMgc3cJuZ7114rYY2Q4jvFczsJKWtGD8/t3cEmejm KdnUWk62kKdW/GP9ZbtOEViVs9kyEz+QAaIfs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EwmsKAAR9EZeJAmAlDaaBhS2SFQYknZY+oQh1g/QCAE=; b=qoF510lvej4RHbx2/6ToMYRLbObeGdMZb7sCjMrBS+zdC4U9plrkMBR2KeCr/4FtRk Cqbh9MsgVf3u2rPsWH/mKb2Br70EqDctqkxkKeLL4bLLwXfNg0nJPTMQt/uD3vXxZccg kw4oTv4uXXRm/qWMRhm1YOahJMGkAx/R5uuVSCJNOvNUQ5Vlgjiz21Bxq2AUJEZIpyU1 kxVxhzjsE4YgQVbrJ1TyOX29eKSk7OoblbyMSQAOo0m/Sr5D4Bg2m+NbOW/R6lm5KpMm zZOGmpZiYJZZHegLVHoPWUJijXlEqmNFlM8Bk3s/hynxMOapBU/TIXZaKpw0D5S8xY8g vM1g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV0GXWfbh/yepy59siIHmasjw2FcJrZIa8FWEWTvXLNZKHtJgYs kixuuMgr1mET0kyX6I5EeJZNyg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxnGY0DZfQrEhOfeE54gwV7TiIH7kOdxAYEFz+gCUTbzfGMuGMB3HDD6dI8E1dq8Lsjv2ux8Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a409:: with SMTP id y9mr8265577pjp.119.1580420294561; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:38:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:15c:202:1:4fff:7a6b:a335:8fde]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w8sm7883326pfj.20.2020.01.30.13.38.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:38:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:38:12 -0800 From: Matthias Kaehlcke To: Pradeep P V K Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com, georgi.djakov@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, asutoshd@codeaurora.org, vbadigan@codeaurora.org, stummala@codeaurora.org, sayalil@codeaurora.org, rampraka@codeaurora.org, sboyd@kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson Subject: Re: [RFC-v2 0/2] Add Support for SDHC bus bandwidth voting Message-ID: <20200130213812.GK71044@google.com> References: <1573220319-4287-1-git-send-email-ppvk@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1573220319-4287-1-git-send-email-ppvk@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi Pradeep, what is the status of this series, do you plan to send v3 soon or is it abandonded? Thanks Matthias On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 07:08:37PM +0530, Pradeep P V K wrote: > Vote for the MSM bus bandwidth required by SDHC driver > based on the clock speed and bus width of the card. > Otherwise, the system clocks may run at minimum clock > speed and thus affecting the performance. > > Adapt to the new ICB framework for bus bandwidth voting. > > This requires the source/destination port ids. > Also this requires a tuple of values. > > The tuple is for two different paths - from SDHC master > to BIMC slave. The other is from CPU master to SDHC slave. > This tuple consists of the average and peak bandwidth. > > This change is based on Georgi Djakov [RFC] > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/11/499) > > --- > changed since v1: > * Addressed all the Review comments. > * Minor code rebasing. > > Pradeep P V K (2): > dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add Bus BW vote supported strings > mmc: sdhci-msm: Add support for bus bandwidth voting > > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 32 ++ > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 366 ++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 395 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.9.1 >