linux-mmc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
	adrian.hunter@intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, baolin.wang7@gmail.com,
	orsonzhai@gmail.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Implement the request_atomic() API
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:40:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202004131201.LSx92dnS%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ed34afa9fb42e0c234065cac5401d7826942b55.1586744073.git.baolin.wang7@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3257 bytes --]

Hi Baolin,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.7-rc1 next-20200412]
[cannot apply to arm-soc/for-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Baolin-Wang/Introduce-the-request_atomic-for-the-host/20200413-105346
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 8f3d9f354286745c751374f5f1fcafee6b3f3136
config: riscv-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        GCC_VERSION=9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=riscv 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c: In function 'sdhci_request_atomic':
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2076:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'sdhci_present_error' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    2076 |  if (sdhci_present_error(host, mrq->cmd, true)) {
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2081:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'sdhci_manual_cmd23'; did you mean 'sdhci_auto_cmd12'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    2081 |  cmd = sdhci_manual_cmd23(host, mrq) ? mrq->sbc : mrq->cmd;
         |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |        sdhci_auto_cmd12
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2090:6: error: invalid use of void expression
    2090 |  if (!sdhci_send_command(host, cmd))
         |      ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/sdhci_present_error +2076 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c

  2066	
  2067	int sdhci_request_atomic(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
  2068	{
  2069		struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
  2070		struct mmc_command *cmd;
  2071		unsigned long flags;
  2072		int ret = 0;
  2073	
  2074		spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
  2075	
> 2076		if (sdhci_present_error(host, mrq->cmd, true)) {
  2077			sdhci_finish_mrq(host, mrq);
  2078			goto out_finish;
  2079		}
  2080	
> 2081		cmd = sdhci_manual_cmd23(host, mrq) ? mrq->sbc : mrq->cmd;
  2082	
  2083		/*
  2084		 * The HSQ may send a command in interrupt context without polling
  2085		 * the busy signaling, which means we should return BUSY if controller
  2086		 * has not released inhibit bits to allow HSQ trying to send request
  2087		 * again in non-atomic context. So we should not finish this request
  2088		 * here.
  2089		 */
> 2090		if (!sdhci_send_command(host, cmd))
  2091			ret = -EBUSY;
  2092		else
  2093			sdhci_led_activate(host);
  2094	
  2095	out_finish:
  2096		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
  2097		return ret;
  2098	}
  2099	EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_request_atomic);
  2100	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 63433 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-13  4:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-13  2:46 [PATCH v5 0/3] Introduce the request_atomic() for the host Baolin Wang
2020-04-13  2:46 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] mmc: host: " Baolin Wang
2020-04-13  2:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Implement the request_atomic() API Baolin Wang
2020-04-13  4:40   ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2020-04-13  5:42   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-13  6:52     ` Baolin Wang
2020-04-14 13:47   ` Adrian Hunter
2020-04-13  2:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] mmc: host: sdhci-sprd: " Baolin Wang
2020-04-14 13:49   ` Adrian Hunter
2020-04-17 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Introduce the request_atomic() for the host Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202004131201.LSx92dnS%lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).