From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: test: remove ambiguity in test description
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:58:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200817115838.2981-1-wsa@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
When reading the test description, I thought a correction of the
xfer_size was tested, which is not the case. It is tested that the
xfer_size is correct. Use 'proper xfer_size' to remove this ambiguity.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
This may be bike-shedding and I am not offended if you think it is
minor. However, I ended up looking at the source wondering where is what
automatically corrected.
drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
index c21b3cb71775..152e7525ed33 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
@@ -2669,22 +2669,22 @@ static const struct mmc_test_case mmc_test_cases[] = {
},
{
- .name = "Correct xfer_size at write (start failure)",
+ .name = "Proper xfer_size at write (start failure)",
.run = mmc_test_xfersize_write,
},
{
- .name = "Correct xfer_size at read (start failure)",
+ .name = "Proper xfer_size at read (start failure)",
.run = mmc_test_xfersize_read,
},
{
- .name = "Correct xfer_size at write (midway failure)",
+ .name = "Proper xfer_size at write (midway failure)",
.run = mmc_test_multi_xfersize_write,
},
{
- .name = "Correct xfer_size at read (midway failure)",
+ .name = "Proper xfer_size at read (midway failure)",
.run = mmc_test_multi_xfersize_read,
},
--
2.20.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-08-17 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 11:58 Wolfram Sang [this message]
2020-08-20 6:56 ` [PATCH] mmc: test: remove ambiguity in test description Niklas Söderlund
2020-08-24 9:50 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200817115838.2981-1-wsa@kernel.org \
--to=wsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).