Linux MultiMedia Card development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenchao Chen <wenchao.chen@unisoc.com>
To: <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<wenchao.chen666@gmail.com>, <zhenxiong.lai@unisoc.com>,
	<yuelin.tang@unisoc.com>, Wenchao Chen <wenchao.chen@unisoc.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 0/2 RESEND] mmc: hsq: dynamically adjust hsq_depth to improve performance
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 10:39:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230905023921.10766-1-wenchao.chen@unisoc.com> (raw)

Change in v3:
- Use "mrq->data->blksz * mrq->data->blocks == 4096" for 4K.
- Add explanation for "HSQ_PERFORMANCE_DEPTH".

Change in v2:
- Support for dynamic adjustment of hsq_depth.

Test
=====
I tested 3 times for each case and output a average speed.
Ran 'fio' to evaluate the performance:
1.Fixed hsq_depth
1) Sequential write:
Speed: 168 164 165
Average speed: 165.67MB/S

2) Sequential read:
Speed: 326 326 326
Average speed: 326MB/S

3) Random write:
Speed: 82.6 83 83
Average speed: 82.87MB/S

4) Random read:
Speed: 48.2 48.3 47.6
Average speed: 48.03MB/S

2.Dynamic hsq_depth
1) Sequential write:
Speed: 167 166 166
Average speed: 166.33MB/S

2) Sequential read:
Speed: 327 326 326
Average speed: 326.3MB/S

3) Random write:
Speed: 86.1 86.2 87.7
Average speed: 86.67MB/S

4) Random read:
Speed: 48.1 48 48
Average speed: 48.03MB/S

Based on the above data, dynamic hsq_depth can improve the performance of random writes.
Random write improved by 4.6%.

In addition, we tested 8K and 16K.
1.Fixed hsq_depth
1) Random write(bs=8K):
Speed: 116 114 115
Average speed: 115MB/S

2) Random read(bs=8K):
Speed: 83 83 82.5
Average speed: 82.8MB/S

3) Random write(bs=16K):
Speed: 141 142 141
Average speed: 141.3MB/S

4) Random read(bs=16K):
Speed: 132 132 132
Average speed: 132MB/S

2.Dynamic hsq_depth(mrq->data->blksz * mrq->data->blocks == 8192 or 16384)
1) Random write(bs=8K):
Speed: 115 115 115
Average speed: 115MB/S

2) Random read(bs=8K):
Speed: 82.7 82.9 82.8
Average speed: 82.8MB/S

3) Random write(bs=16K):
Speed: 143 141 141
Average speed: 141.6MB/S

4) Random read(bs=16K):
Speed: 132 132 132
Average speed: 132MB/S

Increasing hsq_depth cannot improve 8k and 16k random read/write performance.
To reduce latency, we dynamically increase hsq_depth only for 4k random writes.

Test cmd
=========
1)write: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=write -bs=512K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64									
2)read: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=read -bs=512K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64									
3)randwrite: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randwrite -bs=4K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64									
4)randread: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randread -bs=4K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
5)randwrite: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randwrite -bs=8K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64									
6)randread: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randread -bs=8K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
7)randwrite: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randwrite -bs=16K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64									
8)randread: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randread -bs=16K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64

Wenchao Chen (2):
  mmc: queue: replace immediate with hsq->depth
  mmc: hsq: dynamic adjustment of hsq->depth

 drivers/mmc/core/queue.c   |  6 +-----
 drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.h | 11 +++++++++++
 include/linux/mmc/host.h   |  1 +
 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-09-05 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-05  2:39 Wenchao Chen [this message]
2023-09-05  2:39 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] mmc: queue: replace immediate with hsq->depth Wenchao Chen
2023-09-05  2:39 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] mmc: hsq: dynamic adjustment of hsq->depth Wenchao Chen
2023-09-11 11:35 ` [PATCH V3 0/2 RESEND] mmc: hsq: dynamically adjust hsq_depth to improve performance Wenchao Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230905023921.10766-1-wenchao.chen@unisoc.com \
    --to=wenchao.chen@unisoc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wenchao.chen666@gmail.com \
    --cc=yuelin.tang@unisoc.com \
    --cc=zhenxiong.lai@unisoc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox